FTCS vs. BCHP
FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) and BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index, while BCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Principal. FTCS is passively managed, while BCHP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTCS returned 10.35%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for BCHP. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTCS charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BCHP.
Performance
FTCS vs. BCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCS achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than BCHP's 0.96% return.
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.89%
BCHP
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 1.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.80M | $1.22M | $1.16M | |
| $55.85M | $52.96M | $62.83M |
FTCS vs. BCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 7.43% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 7.96% |
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 0.96% | 10.20% | 20.55% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCS and BCHP is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FTCS and BCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTCS vs. BCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTCS
BCHP
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FTCS
BCHP
Industrials
FTCS
BCHP
Healthcare
FTCS
BCHP
Consumer Defensive
FTCS
BCHP
-
Technology
FTCS
BCHP
Consumer Cyclical
FTCS
BCHP
Basic Materials
FTCS
BCHP
-
Communication Services
FTCS
BCHP
Energy
FTCS
BCHP
-
Real Estate
FTCS
-
BCHP
Utilities
FTCS
-
BCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTCS vs. BCHP — Risk / Return Rank
FTCS
BCHP
FTCS vs. BCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTCS | BCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | -0.06 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | -0.18 | +3.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTCS vs. BCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCS drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than BCHP's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCS and BCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCS | BCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -18.56% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -18.12% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.62% | -18.56% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.92% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.90% | -3.09% | -3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 6.04% | -2.56% |
Volatility
FTCS vs. BCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) is 4.61%, while Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that FTCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTCS | BCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 5.81% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.17% | 14.32% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 17.39% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 17.07% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 17.07% | -1.52% |
FTCS vs. BCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTCS has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTCS vs. BCHP - Dividend Comparison
FTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.08% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTCS and BCHP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCHP has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to FTCS (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCS dropped -53.64% vs BCHP's -18.56%.
On 3-year performance, BCHP leads with 14.32% vs 10.35% for FTCS. On fees, FTCS is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BCHP has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTCS is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.
FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.
FTCS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BCHP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for FTCS and 0.58% for BCHP.
FTCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTCS and BCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer