PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBI vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBI vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBI achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


FTBI

1D
0.20%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.80%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBI vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FTBI
First Trust Balanced Income ETF
6.54%11.80%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBI and USL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025

-0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBI vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBI
FTBI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBI vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTBIUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.39

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

6.85

+8.49

FTBI vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBI and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTBIUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.99

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

0.01

+2.65

Drawdowns

FTBI vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBI drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBI and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBIUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-89.06%

+83.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.34%

-16.76%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-39.10%

+38.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-61.45%

+60.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

8.27%

-7.10%

Volatility

FTBI vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) is 2.02%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that FTBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBIUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

10.57%

-8.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

23.34%

-17.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.15%

28.59%

-21.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

30.09%

-22.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

32.34%

-25.21%

FTBI vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBI vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

FTBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTBI and USL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to FTBI (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBI dropped -5.34% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 1-year performance, USL leads with 56.55% vs 17.93% for FTBI. On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, FTBI has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USL has performed better with a 56.55% return vs 17.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.

FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

FTBI is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FTBI and 0.88% for USL.

FTBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBI and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer