FTBI vs. EAOR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTBI (First Trust Balanced Income ETF) and EAOR (iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. FTBI is actively managed, while EAOR is passively managed. Over the past year, FTBI returned 17.93% vs 19.35% for EAOR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTBI charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOR.

Performance

FTBI vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBI achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's 7.77% return.

FTBI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 17.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAOR

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 6M: 8.13%
• 1Y: 19.35%
• 3Y*: 14.04%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBI vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTBI First Trust Balanced Income ETF	6.54%	11.80%
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	7.77%	11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBI and EAOR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	0.85

The correlation between FTBI and EAOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTBI vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBI

FTBI Risk / Return Rank: 78
FTBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FTBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FTBI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FTBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FTBI Martin Ratio Rank: 80

EAOR

EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 69
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBI vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTBI	EAOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.28	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	3.27	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.42	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	2.94	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	12.90	+2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTBI vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBI and EAOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTBI	EAOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.28	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.65	0.88	+1.78

Drawdowns

FTBI vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBI drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum EAOR drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBI and EAOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTBI	EAOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-22.91%	+17.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.34%	-6.62%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.28%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.40%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-5.05%	+4.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	1.50%	-0.33%

Volatility

FTBI vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Balanced Income ETF (FTBI) is 2.02%, while iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that FTBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTBI	EAOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.02%	2.72%	-0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.65%	6.90%	-1.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.15%	8.55%	-1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.13%	10.51%	-3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.13%	10.39%	-3.26%

FTBI vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTBI vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

FTBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, more than EAOR's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF	2.33%	2.45%	2.52%	2.39%	1.99%	1.39%	1.07%
FTBI First Trust Balanced Income ETF	7.87%	4.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTBI and EAOR in my portfolio?

FTBI and EAOR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTBI or EAOR?

EAOR has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to FTBI (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBI dropped -5.34% vs EAOR's -22.91%.

Which ETF is better, FTBI or EAOR?

On 1-year performance, EAOR leads with 19.35% vs 17.93% for FTBI. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FTBI has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTBI or EAOR?

Over the 1-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 17.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTBI or EAOR?

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FTBI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTBI or EAOR?

FTBI has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 2.33% for EAOR.

What is the main difference between FTBI and EAOR?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FTBI and 0.18% for EAOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.