PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAG vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAG vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FTAG

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.73%
6M
5.92%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
5.68%

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAG vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTAG and SPXM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAG vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAG vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTAGSPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.40

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.18

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

10.19

-7.30

FTAG vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAG and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTAG vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAGSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.89%

-5.08%

-85.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-5.08%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.38%

-0.75%

-77.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.28%

-0.78%

-70.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

Volatility

FTAG vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAGSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

0.00%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

3.78%

+7.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

7.66%

+6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

7.61%

+9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

7.61%

+11.86%

FTAG vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAG vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.30%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAG and SPXM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, FTAG leads with 12.51% vs 8.99% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTAG has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTAG.

FTAG has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.47% for SPXM.

SPXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAG and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer