PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAG vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAG vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 3.13% return.


FTAG

1D
-1.95%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
8.59%
6M
10.31%
1Y
11.54%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
4.86%

KNG

1D
0.91%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.13%
6M
3.55%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAG vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
8.59%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%13.88%9.05%-14.65%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
3.13%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAG and KNG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.56

The correlation between FTAG and KNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTAG vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAG
KNG

Basic Materials

55.5%
10.2%

Industrials

24.1%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
23.5%

Healthcare

7.8%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

12.7%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Technology

-

4.3%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Basic Materials

FTAG
55.5%
KNG
10.2%

Industrials

FTAG
24.1%
KNG
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

FTAG
8.4%
KNG
23.5%

Healthcare

FTAG
7.8%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAG
4.2%
KNG
5.5%

Communication Services

FTAG

-

KNG

-

Energy

FTAG

-

KNG
3.0%

Financial Services

FTAG

-

KNG
12.7%

Real Estate

FTAG

-

KNG
4.4%

Technology

FTAG

-

KNG
4.3%

Utilities

FTAG

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAG vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAG vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAGKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.01

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

2.61

+0.46

FTAG vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAG and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAGKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.33

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.50

-0.83

Drawdowns

FTAG vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAGKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.89%

-35.12%

-55.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-8.61%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-14.24%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-18.20%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.00%

-5.03%

-73.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.25%

-4.13%

-67.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.33%

+0.44%

Volatility

FTAG vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.26%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAGKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.26%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

7.44%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

10.22%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

13.60%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

17.18%

+2.49%

FTAG vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAG vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than KNG's 8.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.40%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.59%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAG and KNG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to KNG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, KNG leads with 4.50% vs 0.27% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNG has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 0.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.59%, compared with 1.40% for FTAG.

FTAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.75% for KNG.

KNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAG and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer