PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAAX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A (FTAAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAAX achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAAX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 5.36%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


FTAAX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.66%
YTD
5.61%
6M
6.25%
1Y
14.20%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
5.36%

FASGX

1D
0.30%
1M
3.62%
YTD
11.37%
6M
12.72%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A
5.61%10.98%6.05%9.46%-12.55%5.69%10.84%13.05%-3.23%8.86%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.37%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAAX and FASGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.93

The correlation between FTAAX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAAX
FTAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A (FTAAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAAXFASGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

2.59

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

3.62

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.49

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.34

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.28

14.80

-0.52

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAAX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAAXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.59

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.68

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.79

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.63

+0.09

Drawdowns

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAAX drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAAX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAAXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

-47.35%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-7.95%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.02%

-12.80%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-23.54%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.76%

-27.20%

+10.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-6.71%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.79%

-0.79%

Volatility

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A (FTAAX) is 1.92%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that FTAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAAXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

3.29%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

8.38%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

10.35%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

12.26%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

12.65%

-6.49%

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FTAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FASGX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.59%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
FTAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class A
2.48%2.55%2.79%2.49%4.58%1.56%1.96%2.96%3.51%2.55%1.34%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FTAAX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to FTAAX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAAX dropped -26.49% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FTAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAAX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer