PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. SCHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTA vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 16.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTA having a 11.26% annualized return and SCHV not far behind at 11.18%.


FTA

1D
0.75%
1M
1.78%
6M
12.39%
YTD
15.56%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
11.26%

SCHV

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.27%
6M
12.60%
YTD
16.63%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
15.56%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
16.63%16.02%14.13%8.93%-7.65%25.58%2.64%25.92%-7.30%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and SCHV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.93

The correlation between FTA and SCHV shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTA vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTA
SCHV

Financial Services

21.9%
18.6%

Utilities

10.8%
4.2%

Energy

9.8%
6.4%

Healthcare

9.7%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
6.6%

Technology

8.8%
22.5%

Industrials

8.5%
13.6%

Real Estate

6.6%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
8.3%

Communication Services

5.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

3.4%
2.7%

Financial Services

FTA
21.9%
SCHV
18.6%

Utilities

FTA
10.8%
SCHV
4.2%

Energy

FTA
9.8%
SCHV
6.4%

Healthcare

FTA
9.7%
SCHV
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FTA
9.0%
SCHV
6.6%

Technology

FTA
8.8%
SCHV
22.5%

Industrials

FTA
8.5%
SCHV
13.6%

Real Estate

FTA
6.6%
SCHV
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

FTA
6.4%
SCHV
8.3%

Communication Services

FTA
5.0%
SCHV
2.4%

Basic Materials

FTA
3.4%
SCHV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTASCHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.88

3.62

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.50

14.40

+1.10

FTA vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTA vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and SCHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTASCHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-37.08%

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-6.83%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-15.26%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-19.78%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-37.08%

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.78%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-3.81%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.71%

-0.09%

Volatility

FTA vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 3.67%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTASCHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.06%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

8.83%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

11.26%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

14.55%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

16.92%

+2.92%

FTA vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTA vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than SCHV's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.64%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.78%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTA and SCHV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to FTA (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

On 10-year performance, FTA leads with 11.26% vs 11.18% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.64% for FTA.

FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.04% for SCHV.

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTA and SCHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer