FTA vs. SCHV
FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FTA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTA returned 11.60%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.
Performance
FTA vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCHV's 16.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTA having a 11.60% annualized return and SCHV not far behind at 11.24%.
FTA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 31.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.58%
SCHV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.06M | $3.30M | $2.95M | |
| $128.10M | $109.56M | $118.29M |
FTA vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 18.18% | 14.94% | 10.13% | 10.08% | -3.73% | 29.32% | -0.38% | 24.73% | -13.63% | 18.47% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 16.12% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 8.93% | -7.65% | 25.58% | 2.64% | 25.92% | -7.30% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTA and SCHV is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.92 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTA and SCHV has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FTA vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTA
SCHV
Financial Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FTA
SCHV
Utilities
FTA
SCHV
Healthcare
FTA
SCHV
Consumer Cyclical
FTA
SCHV
Energy
FTA
SCHV
Industrials
FTA
SCHV
Technology
FTA
SCHV
Real Estate
FTA
SCHV
Consumer Defensive
FTA
SCHV
Communication Services
FTA
SCHV
Basic Materials
FTA
SCHV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTA vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
FTA
SCHV
FTA vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTA | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.39 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.93 | 3.66 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.26 | 14.19 | +6.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTA vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than SCHV's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and SCHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTA | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.45% | -37.08% | -25.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | -6.83% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | -15.26% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.80% | -19.78% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.97% | -37.08% | -7.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -2.21% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -3.81% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.76% | -0.26% |
Volatility
FTA vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) at 3.01%. This indicates that FTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTA | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.01% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 8.94% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 11.35% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 14.53% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 16.93% | +2.92% |
FTA vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTA vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHV's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.61% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.79% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTA and SCHV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to SCHV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs SCHV's -37.08%.
On 10-year performance, FTA leads with 11.60% vs 11.24% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.
FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.04% for SCHV.
FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTA and SCHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer