PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTA vs. PWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTA vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed PWV with an annualized return of 11.03%, while PWV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.


FTA

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.98%
6M
11.99%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.03%

PWV

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.43%
YTD
12.10%
6M
12.38%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
10.98%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
12.10%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and PWV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007

0.87

The correlation between FTA and PWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTA vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAPWVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.74

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

3.93

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

6.28

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.76

21.16

-4.41

FTA vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAPWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.74

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.88

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.69

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.41

-0.03

Drawdowns

FTA vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than PWV's maximum drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and PWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAPWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.45%

-49.04%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-4.05%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-14.31%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.80%

-16.36%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

-37.67%

-7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.51%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-9.50%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.20%

+0.41%

Volatility

FTA vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) at 2.35%. This indicates that FTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAPWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.35%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

6.62%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

9.31%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

14.35%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

17.16%

+2.80%

FTA vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTA vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than PWV's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.68%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
PWV
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF
1.81%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTA and PWV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTA has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to PWV (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs PWV's -49.04%.

On 10-year performance, PWV leads with 11.81% vs 11.03% for FTA. On fees, PWV is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWV has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWV is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.68% for FTA.

FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.58% for PWV.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTA and PWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer