FTA vs. LGLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while LGLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTA returned 11.03%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for LGLV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGLV.

Performance

FTA vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than LGLV's 0.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTA having a 11.03% annualized return and LGLV not far behind at 11.00%.

FTA

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 26.91%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

LGLV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.07%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	10.98%	14.94%	10.13%	10.08%	-3.73%	29.32%	-0.38%	24.73%	-13.63%	18.47%
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	0.83%	8.37%	16.22%	9.19%	-8.17%	27.95%	7.42%	30.83%	0.32%	17.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and LGLV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013	0.75

The correlation between FTA and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTA vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTA	LGLV
Financial Services	19.7%	9.9%
Utilities	13.3%	11.8%
Healthcare	10.6%	7.0%
Energy	9.6%	3.7%
Industrials	9.6%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	9.4%
Technology	8.0%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	5.9%
Real Estate	5.9%	17.4%
Communication Services	4.3%	4.2%
Basic Materials	2.7%	3.5%

Return for Risk

FTA vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA

FTA Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

LGLV

LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 13
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 12
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTA	LGLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	0.31	+2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	0.51	+2.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.06	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.26	0.42	+4.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.76	1.08	+15.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTA vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTA	LGLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	0.31	+2.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.60	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.69	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.76	-0.38

Drawdowns

FTA vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than LGLV's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and LGLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTA	LGLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.45%	-36.64%	-25.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.13%	-6.86%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-10.17%	-8.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.80%	-17.49%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.97%	-36.64%	-8.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-6.60%	+5.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-3.21%	-5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	2.67%	-1.06%

Volatility

FTA vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) at 2.42%. This indicates that FTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTA	LGLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	2.42%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.44%	6.52%	+0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	9.20%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	12.91%	+3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	16.06%	+3.90%

FTA vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTA vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than LGLV's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.68%	1.89%	2.02%	2.10%	2.15%	1.54%	2.03%	1.88%	2.28%	1.53%	1.56%	2.05%
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF	2.04%	1.94%	1.93%	2.03%	1.95%	1.65%	1.98%	1.89%	2.09%	4.39%	2.54%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTA and LGLV in my portfolio?

FTA and LGLV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTA or LGLV?

FTA has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to LGLV (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

Which ETF is better, FTA or LGLV?

On 10-year performance, FTA leads with 11.03% vs 11.00% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTA or LGLV?

Over the 10-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTA or LGLV?

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTA or LGLV?

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.68% for FTA.

What is the main difference between FTA and LGLV?

FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while LGLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.12% for LGLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.