FTA vs. HDV
FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTA returned 11.60%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for HDV. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
FTA vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 11.60%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.
FTA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 31.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.58%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.06M | $3.30M | $2.95M | |
| $196.84M | $160.55M | $106.56M |
FTA vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 18.18% | 14.94% | 10.13% | 10.08% | -3.73% | 29.32% | -0.38% | 24.73% | -13.63% | 18.47% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 20.03% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTA and HDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FTA and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTA vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTA
HDV
Financial Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FTA
HDV
Utilities
FTA
HDV
Healthcare
FTA
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
FTA
HDV
Energy
FTA
HDV
Industrials
FTA
HDV
Technology
FTA
HDV
Real Estate
FTA
HDV
-
Consumer Defensive
FTA
HDV
Communication Services
FTA
HDV
Basic Materials
FTA
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTA vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
FTA
HDV
FTA vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTA | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.42 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.93 | 4.98 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.26 | 13.63 | +6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTA vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTA | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.45% | -37.04% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | -5.18% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | -10.49% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.80% | -15.42% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.97% | -37.04% | -7.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -1.41% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -3.06% | -5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.89% | -0.39% |
Volatility
FTA vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 3.93%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTA | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.98% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 8.72% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 10.85% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 12.95% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 15.78% | +4.07% |
FTA vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTA vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.61% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTA and HDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to FTA (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, FTA leads with 11.60% vs 9.66% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTA has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.
FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.08% for HDV.
FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTA and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer