FSZ vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSZ (First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSZ returned 9.42%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FDL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.

Performance

FSZ vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FSZ has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 9.42%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.

FSZ

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 6.03%
• 1Y: 9.94%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: 9.42%

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSZ vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	2.04%	30.10%	-1.85%	21.30%	-20.12%	20.18%	13.83%	25.88%	-15.22%	31.30%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	24.41%	-5.99%	12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and FDL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012	0.46

The correlation between FSZ and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSZ vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSZ	FDL
Industrials	22.0%	3.8%
Healthcare	22.0%	16.8%
Financial Services	18.9%	15.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	3.8%
Basic Materials	8.2%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	14.7%
Communication Services	3.9%	10.6%
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Utilities	3.1%	6.5%
Technology	1.6%	1.1%
Energy	-	27.3%

Return for Risk

FSZ vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSZ

FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 20
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSZ vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSZ	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.11	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	3.25	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.37	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	5.56	-4.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.41	13.56	-11.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSZ vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSZ	FDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	2.11	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.88	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.66	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.45	+0.06

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSZ	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.97%	-65.93%	+31.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.39%	-4.27%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.93%	-12.24%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.96%	-16.46%	-17.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.97%	-41.40%	+7.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.11%	-2.18%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-9.66%	+2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	1.75%	+2.39%

Volatility

FSZ vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that FSZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSZ	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	2.85%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.70%	7.87%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.25%	11.28%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	14.31%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.11%	+1.84%

FSZ vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSZ vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
FSZ First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund	2.39%	1.80%	1.80%	2.11%	3.50%	1.62%	1.53%	2.01%	2.29%	1.49%	1.93%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSZ and FDL in my portfolio?

FSZ and FDL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSZ or FDL?

FSZ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, FSZ or FDL?

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.24% vs 9.42% for FSZ. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSZ or FDL?

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSZ or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSZ or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.39% for FSZ.

What is the main difference between FSZ and FDL?

FSZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FSZ and 0.45% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.