PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZ vs. ENOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZ vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than ENOR's 28.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSZ having a 9.42% annualized return and ENOR not far behind at 9.41%.


FSZ

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.60%
YTD
2.04%
6M
6.03%
1Y
9.94%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
9.42%

ENOR

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
28.21%
6M
33.17%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSZ vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.04%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.21%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and ENOR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FSZ and ENOR has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSZ vs. ENOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSZ
ENOR

Industrials

22.0%
13.9%

Healthcare

22.0%

-

Financial Services

18.9%
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

8.2%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
12.4%

Communication Services

3.9%
5.8%

Real Estate

3.7%
0.4%

Utilities

3.1%
0.7%

Technology

1.6%
4.1%

Energy

-

29.2%

Industrials

FSZ
22.0%
ENOR
13.9%

Healthcare

FSZ
22.0%
ENOR

-

Financial Services

FSZ
18.9%
ENOR
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FSZ
10.0%
ENOR
0.2%

Basic Materials

FSZ
8.2%
ENOR
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

FSZ
6.6%
ENOR
12.4%

Communication Services

FSZ
3.9%
ENOR
5.8%

Real Estate

FSZ
3.7%
ENOR
0.4%

Utilities

FSZ
3.1%
ENOR
0.7%

Technology

FSZ
1.6%
ENOR
4.1%

Energy

FSZ

-

ENOR
29.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZ vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSZ vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSZENORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

4.16

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

11.78

-9.37

FSZ vs. ENOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the ENOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and ENOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSZENORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.15

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.39

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.25

+0.26

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum ENOR drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and ENOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZENORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-55.35%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-9.01%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-15.84%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-32.65%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-54.21%

+20.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-3.15%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-16.58%

+9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

3.18%

+0.96%

Volatility

FSZ vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) is 4.72%, while iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that FSZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZENORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

5.14%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

13.62%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

17.43%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

22.18%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

24.02%

-5.07%

FSZ vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSZ vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than ENOR's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.31%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.39%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSZ and ENOR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENOR has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to FSZ (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs ENOR's -55.35%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 9.42% vs 9.41% for ENOR. On fees, ENOR is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENOR is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.

FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FSZ and 0.53% for ENOR.

ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZ and ENOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer