PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSZ vs. EFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSZ vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSZ achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FSZ has outperformed EFNL with an annualized return of 9.88%, while EFNL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.75% annualized return.


FSZ

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.37%
6M
0.72%
YTD
4.14%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
9.88%
ALL TIME*
9.31%

EFNL

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.50%
6M
5.21%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
8.75%
ALL TIME*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$714.99K$2.76M$4.00M
$60.67K$60.90K$87.60K

FSZ vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
4.14%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
9.32%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FSZ and EFNL is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.65

The correlation between FSZ and EFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSZ vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSZ
EFNL

Healthcare

23.1%
4.4%

Industrials

22.2%
21.0%

Financial Services

18.8%
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
4.4%

Basic Materials

8.0%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

3.2%
0.8%

Utilities

2.6%
3.8%

Technology

1.4%
16.4%

Energy

-

5.0%

Healthcare

FSZ
23.1%
EFNL
4.4%

Industrials

FSZ
22.2%
EFNL
21.0%

Financial Services

FSZ
18.8%
EFNL
28.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FSZ
11.0%
EFNL
4.4%

Basic Materials

FSZ
8.0%
EFNL
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

FSZ
6.3%
EFNL
3.2%

Communication Services

FSZ
3.5%
EFNL
2.3%

Real Estate

FSZ
3.2%
EFNL
0.8%

Utilities

FSZ
2.6%
EFNL
3.8%

Technology

FSZ
1.4%
EFNL
16.4%

Energy

FSZ

-

EFNL
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSZ vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSZ vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSZEFNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.27

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.49

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

7.18

-4.47

FSZ vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSZ and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSZ vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSZ drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum EFNL drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSZ and EFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSZEFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-38.70%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-12.17%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-15.78%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-38.70%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-38.70%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-10.18%

+7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-10.90%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

4.22%

-0.32%

Volatility

FSZ vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) is 4.82%, while iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a volatility of 5.84%. This indicates that FSZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSZEFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

5.84%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

16.30%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

19.29%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.43%

20.00%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

19.91%

-1.20%

FSZ vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSZ vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

FSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than EFNL's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
1.04%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.00%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSZ and EFNL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to FSZ (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSZ dropped -33.97% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 9.88% vs 8.75% for EFNL. On fees, EFNL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFNL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.04% for EFNL.

FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FSZ and 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSZ and EFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer