FSTA vs. NVDY
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and NVDY (YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while NVDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. FSTA is passively managed, while NVDY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FSTA returned 7.47%/yr vs 55.07%/yr for NVDY. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDY.
Performance
FSTA vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 14.49% return.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 1.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
NVDY
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 6M
- 17.01%
- 1Y
- 47.85%
- 3Y*
- 55.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.69% | 1.82% | 13.31% | -1.93% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 14.49% | 27.38% | 114.23% | 42.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and NVDY is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023 | -0.11 |
The correlation between FSTA and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
NVDY
FSTA vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTA | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.29 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.75 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 9.22 | -8.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTA | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 1.76 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.65 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and NVDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -34.08% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -12.81% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -34.08% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -5.47% | -3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -6.15% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 5.21% | -0.67% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 4.03%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | NVDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 9.43% | -5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 20.71% | -10.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 27.33% | -14.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 38.22% | -25.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 38.22% | -23.67% |
FSTA vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than NVDY's 62.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 62.14% | 83.10% | 83.65% | 22.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and NVDY have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDY has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to FSTA (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs NVDY's -34.08%.
On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 55.07% vs 7.47% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 55.07% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.
NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 62.14%, compared with 2.25% for FSTA.
FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.99% for NVDY.
NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and NVDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer