PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 6.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed FUTY with an annualized return of 7.91%, while FUTY has yielded a comparatively higher 9.27% annualized return.


FSTA

1D
1.73%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
8.86%
6M
8.88%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
7.91%

FUTY

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
6.83%
6M
6.88%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
9.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
8.86%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
6.83%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and FUTY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and FUTY has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSTA vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
FUTY

Consumer Defensive

97.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%

-

Industrials

0.3%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

99.3%

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.6%
FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.7%
FUTY

-

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
FUTY
0.2%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
FUTY

-

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
FUTY

-

Communication Services

FSTA

-

FUTY

-

Energy

FSTA

-

FUTY
0.5%

Financial Services

FSTA

-

FUTY

-

Real Estate

FSTA

-

FUTY

-

Technology

FSTA

-

FUTY

-

Utilities

FSTA

-

FUTY
99.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTAFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

1.58

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

3.37

-2.24

FSTA vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTAFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-36.44%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-8.93%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-17.35%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-25.11%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

-36.44%

+11.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-3.99%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-6.03%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

4.18%

+0.53%

Volatility

FSTA vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 4.99% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTAFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

5.22%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

11.57%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

14.46%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

17.06%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

19.08%

-4.49%

FSTA vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSTA and FUTY have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSTA vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than FUTY's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.20%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.60%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and FUTY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FSTA (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, FUTY leads with 9.27% vs 7.91% for FSTA. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FUTY has performed better with a 9.27% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA and FUTY have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.20% for FSTA.

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index.

FUTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer