PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 9.62% return.


FSTA

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
5.16%
6M
3.92%
1Y
0.25%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
7.51%

FDVV

1D
0.05%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.62%
6M
10.33%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
5.16%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
9.62%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and FDVV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and FDVV has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSTA vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
FDVV

Consumer Defensive

97.3%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
13.6%

Industrials

0.3%
3.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Healthcare

0.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

17.0%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Technology

-

29.1%

Utilities

-

8.7%

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.3%
FDVV
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.8%
FDVV
13.6%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
FDVV
3.4%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
FDVV

-

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
FDVV
3.1%

Communication Services

FSTA

-

FDVV
3.7%

Energy

FSTA

-

FDVV

-

Financial Services

FSTA

-

FDVV
17.0%

Real Estate

FSTA

-

FDVV
10.1%

Technology

FSTA

-

FDVV
29.1%

Utilities

FSTA

-

FDVV
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTAFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

2.60

-2.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

3.63

-3.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.48

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

2.85

-2.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.09

11.90

-11.81

FSTA vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTAFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

2.60

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.94

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.80

-0.20

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTAFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-40.25%

+15.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-9.30%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-15.90%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-20.18%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

0.00%

-9.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-3.81%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

2.23%

+2.29%

Volatility

FSTA vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.20%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTAFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.20%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

7.92%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

9.99%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

14.74%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

17.00%

-2.44%

FSTA vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTA vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than FDVV's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.69%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.26%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and FDVV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FDVV (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.73% vs 5.90% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.26% for FSTA.

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer