FSTA vs. FDVV
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSTA returned 5.90%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for FDVV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
FSTA vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 9.62% return.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.16% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 9.62% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and FDVV is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and FDVV has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FSTA vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
FDVV
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
FDVV
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
FDVV
Industrials
FSTA
FDVV
Basic Materials
FSTA
FDVV
-
Healthcare
FSTA
FDVV
Communication Services
FSTA
-
FDVV
Energy
FSTA
-
FDVV
-
Financial Services
FSTA
-
FDVV
Real Estate
FSTA
-
FDVV
Technology
FSTA
-
FDVV
Utilities
FSTA
-
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
FDVV
FSTA vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 2.60 | -2.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.12 | 3.63 | -3.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.48 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 2.85 | -2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 11.90 | -11.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 2.60 | -2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.94 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -40.25% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -9.30% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -15.90% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -20.18% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | 0.00% | -9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -3.81% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 2.23% | +2.29% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.20%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.20% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 7.92% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 9.99% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 14.74% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 17.00% | -2.44% |
FSTA vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than FDVV's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.26% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and FDVV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FDVV (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.73% vs 5.90% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.26% for FSTA.
FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.29% for FDVV.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer