FSTA vs. DVXP
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and DVXP (WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index while DVXP tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLP Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXP.
Performance
FSTA vs. DVXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than DVXP's 8.35% return.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
DVXP
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA vs. DVXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.16% | -3.44% |
DVXP WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF | 8.35% | -10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and DVXP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. DVXP — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
DVXP
FSTA vs. DVXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF (DVXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTA | DVXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.12 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTA | DVXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | -0.15 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. DVXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, which is greater than DVXP's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and DVXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | DVXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -16.36% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -12.86% | +3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.24% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | — | — |
Volatility
FSTA vs. DVXP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | DVXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 21.07% | -8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 21.07% | -7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 21.07% | -6.51% |
FSTA vs. DVXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXP's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. DVXP - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than DVXP's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXP WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.26% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FSTA and DVXP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXP.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.17% for DVXP.
FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while DVXP tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLP Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.89% for DVXP.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and DVXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer