PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. DVXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. DVXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF (DVXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than DVXP's 8.35% return.


FSTA

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
5.16%
6M
3.92%
1Y
0.25%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
7.51%

DVXP

1D
-0.30%
1M
-4.03%
YTD
8.35%
6M
6.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. DVXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and DVXP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. DVXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. DVXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF (DVXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTADVXPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.09

FSTA vs. DVXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTADVXPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.15

+0.76

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. DVXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, which is greater than DVXP's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and DVXP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTADVXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-16.36%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

-12.86%

+3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-8.24%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

Volatility

FSTA vs. DVXP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTADVXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

21.07%

-8.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

21.07%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

21.07%

-6.51%

FSTA vs. DVXP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXP's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTA vs. DVXP - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than DVXP's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVXP
WEBs Consumer Staples XLP Defined Volatility ETF
0.17%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.26%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FSTA and DVXP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXP.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.17% for DVXP.

FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while DVXP tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLP Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.89% for DVXP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and DVXP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer