FSTA vs. ALAI
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and ALAI (Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while ALAI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Alger. FSTA is passively managed, while ALAI is actively managed. Over the past year, FSTA returned 1.51% vs 61.30% for ALAI. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ALAI.
Performance
FSTA vs. ALAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than ALAI's 26.20% return.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 1.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
ALAI
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 11.99%
- YTD
- 26.20%
- 6M
- 24.67%
- 1Y
- 61.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA vs. ALAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.69% | 1.82% | 8.64% |
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF | 26.20% | 39.81% | 31.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and ALAI is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2024 | -0.08 |
The correlation between FSTA and ALAI shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FSTA vs. ALAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
ALAI
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
ALAI
-
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
ALAI
Industrials
FSTA
ALAI
Basic Materials
FSTA
ALAI
-
Healthcare
FSTA
ALAI
Communication Services
FSTA
-
ALAI
Energy
FSTA
-
ALAI
-
Financial Services
FSTA
-
ALAI
Real Estate
FSTA
-
ALAI
-
Technology
FSTA
-
ALAI
Utilities
FSTA
-
ALAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. ALAI — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
ALAI
FSTA vs. ALAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTA | ALAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.41 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 3.16 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 10.14 | -9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTA | ALAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 2.56 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.69 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. ALAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum ALAI drawdown of -29.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and ALAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | ALAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -29.36% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -19.48% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.64% | -2.44% | -6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -5.13% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 6.06% | -1.52% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. ALAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 4.03%, while Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF (ALAI) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | ALAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 7.11% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 18.60% | -8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 24.06% | -11.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 28.39% | -15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 28.39% | -13.84% |
FSTA vs. ALAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ALAI's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. ALAI - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than ALAI's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAI Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF | 1.19% | 1.50% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and ALAI have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALAI has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to FSTA (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs ALAI's -29.36%.
On 1-year performance, ALAI leads with 61.30% vs 1.51% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ALAI has performed better with a 61.30% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ALAI.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.19% for ALAI.
FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ALAI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Alger. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.55% for ALAI.
ALAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and ALAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer