FSST vs. RBIL
FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
FSST vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSST vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 17.60% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.67% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSST and RBIL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSST vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
FSST
RBIL
FSST vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSST | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 4.24 | — |
Drawdowns
FSST vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSST | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.03% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.06% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
FSST vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSST | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 1.05% | — |
FSST vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSST vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
FSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSST and RBIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.14% for FSST.
FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FSST tracks Russell 3000, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for FSST and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer