PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSST vs. NZAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSST vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSST

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NZAC

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.49%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.51%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSST vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSST
Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF
0.00%15.40%21.40%25.49%-18.30%12.81%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
8.83%20.55%16.67%23.22%-19.77%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FSST and NZAC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FSST and NZAC has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSST vs. NZAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSST
NZAC

Technology

29.6%
34.3%

Industrials

13.0%
7.3%

Financial Services

12.1%
13.1%

Communication Services

11.7%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
8.2%

Healthcare

10.2%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.0%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.9%

Energy

1.9%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
5.2%

Utilities

0.9%
1.4%

Technology

FSST
29.6%
NZAC
34.3%

Industrials

FSST
13.0%
NZAC
7.3%

Financial Services

FSST
12.1%
NZAC
13.1%

Communication Services

FSST
11.7%
NZAC
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FSST
11.5%
NZAC
8.2%

Healthcare

FSST
10.2%
NZAC
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

FSST
4.6%
NZAC
1.0%

Basic Materials

FSST
3.4%
NZAC
1.9%

Energy

FSST
1.9%
NZAC
1.2%

Real Estate

FSST
1.3%
NZAC
5.2%

Utilities

FSST
0.9%
NZAC
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSST vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSST

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSST vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSST vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSSTNZACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

FSST vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSSTNZACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

FSST vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSSTNZACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

FSST vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSST vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

FSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than NZAC's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSST
Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF
0.14%0.19%2.01%0.68%1.00%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.04%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSST and NZAC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.14% for FSST.

FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while NZAC is Global Equities. FSST tracks Russell 3000, while NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.12% for NZAC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSST and NZAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer