FSST vs. NZAC
FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000, while NZAC is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.
Performance
FSST vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FSST
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NZAC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
FSST vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 15.40% | 21.40% | 25.49% | -18.30% | 12.81% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 8.83% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -19.77% | 6.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSST and NZAC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSST and NZAC has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FSST vs. NZAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSST
NZAC
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
FSST
NZAC
Industrials
FSST
NZAC
Financial Services
FSST
NZAC
Communication Services
FSST
NZAC
Consumer Cyclical
FSST
NZAC
Healthcare
FSST
NZAC
Consumer Defensive
FSST
NZAC
Basic Materials
FSST
NZAC
Energy
FSST
NZAC
Real Estate
FSST
NZAC
Utilities
FSST
NZAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSST vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank
FSST
NZAC
FSST vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSST | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.61 | — |
Drawdowns
FSST vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSST | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.82% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.32% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility
FSST vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSST | NZAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.94% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.81% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 17.14% | — |
FSST vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSST vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison
FSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than NZAC's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 2.01% | 0.68% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.04% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSST and NZAC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FSST.
NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.14% for FSST.
FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while NZAC is Global Equities. FSST tracks Russell 3000, while NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.12% for NZAC.
Find the right allocation for FSST and NZAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer