FSST vs. BASG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSST (Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF) and BASG (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSST is a Sustainable fund tracking the Russell 3000, while BASG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSST charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for BASG.

Performance

FSST vs. BASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FSST

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BASG

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: -1.27%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSST vs. BASG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	14.93%
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF	-0.02%	1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FSST and BASG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

FSST vs. BASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSST

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BASG

BASG Risk / Return Rank: 11
BASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BASG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BASG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSST vs. BASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSST	BASG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.04	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.15	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.38	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FSST	BASG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.30%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.09%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.75%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSST	BASG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.19%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.07%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.07%	—

FSST vs. BASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSST has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BASG's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSST vs. BASG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSST nor BASG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSST Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF	0.10%	0.19%	2.01%	0.68%	1.00%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSST and BASG in my portfolio?

FSST and BASG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FSST or BASG?

On fees, FSST is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSST or BASG?

FSST is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for BASG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSST or BASG?

FSST has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for BASG.

What is the main difference between FSST and BASG?

FSST is categorized as Sustainable, while BASG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Brown Advisory. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FSST and 0.61% for BASG.