FSRTX vs. FCAZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSRTX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M) and FCAZX (Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FSRTX returned 5.18%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for FCAZX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSRTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for FCAZX.

Performance

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSRTX having a 6.49% return and FCAZX slightly lower at 6.47%. Over the past 10 years, FSRTX has underperformed FCAZX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while FCAZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.

FSRTX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 12.20%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 5.18%

FCAZX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 17.52%
• 3Y*: 15.86%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	6.49%	10.08%	5.57%	4.33%	-3.58%	15.50%	3.49%	10.24%	-4.26%	3.78%
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	6.47%	14.61%	16.27%	25.65%	-20.52%	16.05%	18.51%	26.08%	-6.87%	19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRTX and FCAZX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.50

The correlation between FSRTX and FCAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSRTX vs. FCAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRTX

FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FCAZX

FCAZX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FCAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FCAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FCAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FCAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRTX	FCAZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.30	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	1.86	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.24	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	1.56	+2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.53	6.56	+11.97

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FCAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRTX and FCAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRTX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FCAZX drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRTX and FCAZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRTX	FCAZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-32.73%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-10.98%	+8.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	-17.80%	+11.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.89%	-29.53%	+16.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.88%	-32.73%	+12.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-0.42%	-2.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-5.12%	+0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	2.61%	-1.95%

Volatility

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) is 1.37%, while Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that FSRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRTX	FCAZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	5.17%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	10.83%	-6.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.87%	13.20%	-8.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	16.97%	-10.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.73%	16.88%	-10.15%

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FCAZX's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRTX vs. FCAZX - Dividend Comparison

FSRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than FCAZX's 13.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	13.27%	7.51%	7.25%	4.44%	8.39%	3.94%	7.30%	8.49%	6.14%	3.09%	4.63%	5.17%
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	3.96%	4.44%	4.56%	5.05%	7.07%	5.14%	2.02%	2.81%	9.10%	2.32%	2.06%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRTX and FCAZX in my portfolio?

FSRTX and FCAZX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSRTX or FCAZX?

FCAZX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to FSRTX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRTX dropped -33.57% vs FCAZX's -32.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.