FCAZX vs. FKGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX).
FCAZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Aug 14, 2003. FKGRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 1, 1948.
Performance
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund | -5.44% | 14.61% | 16.27% | 25.65% | -20.52% | 16.05% | 18.51% | 26.08% | -6.87% | 19.10% |
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund | -5.57% | 15.38% | 17.96% | 27.54% | -25.32% | 21.61% | 30.71% | 32.08% | -3.37% | 26.31% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCAZX having a -5.44% return and FKGRX slightly lower at -5.57%. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.88% annualized return.
FCAZX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
FKGRX
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -5.57%
- 6M
- -4.46%
- 1Y
- 15.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCAZX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FCAZX
FKGRX
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAZX | FKGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.34 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 5.21 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAZX | FKGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.66 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.69 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAZX and FKGRX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison
FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, less than FKGRX's 15.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund | 7.95% | 7.51% | 7.25% | 4.44% | 8.39% | 3.94% | 7.30% | 8.49% | 6.14% | 3.09% | 4.63% | 5.17% |
FKGRX Franklin Growth Fund | 15.22% | 14.37% | 8.34% | 6.26% | 10.49% | 9.19% | 7.97% | 5.75% | 1.65% | 2.38% | 3.26% | 3.88% |
Drawdowns
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum FKGRX drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and FKGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAZX | FKGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -51.08% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -11.48% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.53% | -32.22% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.73% | -32.52% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.26% | -8.62% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -6.76% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.05% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FCAZX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) have volatilities of 6.01% and 5.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCAZX | FKGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 5.85% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 10.49% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 18.91% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 19.62% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 19.50% | -2.69% |