FSRTX vs. MCONX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSRTX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M) and MCONX (Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FSRTX returned 5.18%/yr vs 3.97%/yr for MCONX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSRTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MCONX.

Performance

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRTX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than MCONX's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRTX has outperformed MCONX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while MCONX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.97% annualized return.

FSRTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 3.20%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 1Y: 12.84%
• 3Y*: 7.87%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 5.18%
• ALL TIME*: 3.78%

MCONX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -0.88%
• 6M: 1.34%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 1Y: 7.24%
• 3Y*: 6.93%
• 5Y*: 1.65%
• 10Y*: 3.97%
• ALL TIME*: 4.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	6.83%	10.08%	5.57%	4.33%	-3.58%	15.50%	3.49%	10.24%	-4.26%	3.78%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	2.43%	10.15%	5.16%	9.51%	-14.59%	1.66%	10.28%	13.67%	-2.64%	8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRTX and MCONX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between FSRTX and MCONX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSRTX vs. MCONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSRTX

FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

MCONX

MCONX Risk / Return Rank: 43
MCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRTX	MCONX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.35	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	1.95	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.25	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	1.63	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	6.40	+4.77

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the MCONX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRTX and MCONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRTX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than MCONX's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRTX and MCONX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRTX	MCONX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-21.51%	-12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.64%	-4.45%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	-5.67%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.89%	-21.51%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.88%	-21.51%	+1.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-1.32%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-2.96%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.13%	-0.02%

Volatility

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) at 1.45%. This indicates that FSRTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRTX	MCONX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	1.45%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.00%	4.51%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.06%	5.39%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.92%	6.93%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.74%	6.21%	+0.53%

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MCONX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRTX vs. MCONX - Dividend Comparison

FSRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than MCONX's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	3.00%	4.44%	4.56%	5.05%	7.07%	5.14%	2.02%	2.81%	9.10%	2.32%	2.06%	1.41%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	4.63%	4.76%	4.90%	1.85%	2.31%	1.66%	3.49%	2.61%	3.84%	3.06%	2.25%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRTX and MCONX in my portfolio?

FSRTX and MCONX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSRTX or MCONX?

FSRTX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to MCONX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRTX dropped -33.57% vs MCONX's -21.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.