FSRTX vs. FSRKX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSRTX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M) and FSRKX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSRTX returned 5.83%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for FSRKX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSRTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FSRKX.

Performance

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSRTX having a 6.49% return and FSRKX slightly higher at 6.77%.

FSRTX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 12.20%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 5.18%

FSRKX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: 6.77%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 12.82%
• 3Y*: 9.03%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	6.49%	10.08%	5.57%	4.33%	-3.58%	15.50%	3.49%	1.83%
FSRKX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6	6.77%	10.59%	6.00%	4.81%	-3.13%	16.06%	3.94%	1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRTX and FSRKX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019	0.98

The correlation between FSRTX and FSRKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSRTX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRTX

FSRTX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FSRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FSRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FSRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FSRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FSRKX

FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRTX	FSRKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.63	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	3.66	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.50	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	4.97	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.53	19.90	-1.37

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRTX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRTX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRTX and FSRKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRTX	FSRKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-19.93%	-13.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.70%	-2.57%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.87%	-5.84%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.89%	-12.74%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-2.57%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-3.20%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	0.64%	+0.02%

Volatility

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M (FSRTX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRTX	FSRKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	1.32%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	3.78%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.87%	4.87%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	6.94%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.73%	7.78%	-1.05%

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRTX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

FSRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than FSRKX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRKX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6	4.33%	4.83%	4.98%	5.38%	7.38%	5.43%	2.31%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSRTX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class M	3.96%	4.44%	4.56%	5.05%	7.07%	5.14%	2.02%	2.81%	9.10%	2.32%	2.06%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRTX and FSRKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FSRTX and FSRKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSRTX or FSRKX?

FSRTX has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to FSRKX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRTX dropped -33.57% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.