FSRPX vs. FSCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX).
FSRPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985. FSCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 1990.
Performance
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | -4.91% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | -11.31% | 7.88% | 24.56% | 41.81% | -34.88% | 19.23% | 35.68% | 27.06% | -1.03% | 21.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a -4.91% return, which is significantly higher than FSCPX's -11.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSRPX having a 11.47% annualized return and FSCPX not far behind at 10.93%.
FSRPX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- 1Y
- -0.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
FSCPX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -11.31%
- 6M
- -9.98%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCPX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRPX vs. FSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRPX
FSCPX
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRPX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 0.45 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 0.85 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.11 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.47 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 1.63 | -2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRPX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.45 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.18 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRPX and FSCPX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Dividend Comparison
FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than FSCPX's 6.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 9.20% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | 6.52% | 5.78% | 7.41% | 2.17% | 13.79% | 9.08% | 1.16% | 2.22% | 3.32% | 3.72% | 0.90% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FSCPX drawdown of -57.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and FSCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRPX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -57.76% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.79% | -15.99% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.01% | -39.23% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.01% | -39.23% | +0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.40% | -15.99% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -8.56% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 4.62% | +1.80% |
Volatility
FSRPX vs. FSCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) is 5.08%, while Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that FSRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRPX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 6.45% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 13.51% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 24.70% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 24.67% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 22.59% | -1.03% |