PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRCX vs. FCNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRCX achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCNVX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRCX has outperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 3.28%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.


FSRCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.68%
YTD
2.70%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.28%

FCNVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
2.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
2.70%7.88%4.38%7.98%-12.53%2.56%6.41%9.95%-3.81%7.01%
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
1.50%4.51%5.43%5.86%0.85%-0.06%1.10%3.00%1.82%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRCX and FCNVX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRCX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRCX
FSRCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNVX
FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRCXFCNVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

3.49

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

20.39

-16.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

10.74

-9.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

46.60

-43.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.65

152.32

-137.66

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRCX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRCXFCNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

3.49

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

2.79

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

2.48

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

2.20

-1.04

Drawdowns

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRCX drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRCX and FCNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRCXFCNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-2.19%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-0.10%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.24%

-0.30%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-0.59%

-16.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.69%

-2.19%

-14.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-0.05%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.03%

+0.59%

Volatility

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.33%. This indicates that FSRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRCXFCNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

0.33%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

0.85%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49%

1.19%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

1.29%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

1.04%

+3.37%

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRCX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

FSRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than FCNVX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
4.15%4.41%5.17%4.97%1.24%0.24%0.99%2.45%2.21%1.30%1.01%0.48%
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
3.28%3.32%2.59%3.03%2.08%3.36%3.59%3.33%2.50%3.20%2.69%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRCX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRCX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to FCNVX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRCX dropped -18.16% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRCX and FCNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer