PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRCX vs. VSGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRCX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than VSGBX's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRCX has outperformed VSGBX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while VSGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.74% annualized return.


FSRCX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.25%
6M
0.65%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
1.50%
10Y*
2.89%
ALL TIME*
4.71%

VSGBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.29%
6M
0.22%
YTD
0.44%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
1.74%
ALL TIME*
3.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
1.23%7.88%4.38%7.98%-12.53%2.56%6.41%9.95%-3.81%7.01%
VSGBX
Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares
0.44%5.83%4.17%3.82%-5.31%-0.66%4.36%4.10%1.27%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRCX and VSGBX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994

0.43

The correlation between FSRCX and VSGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRCX vs. VSGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSRCX
FSRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VSGBX
VSGBX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) and Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSRCXVSGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.46

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

7.83

-0.91

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VSGBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRCX and VSGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRCX drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, which is greater than VSGBX's maximum drawdown of -7.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRCX and VSGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRCXVSGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-7.42%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-1.35%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-1.35%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-7.40%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.69%

-7.42%

-9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-0.57%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-0.73%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.42%

+0.29%

Volatility

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C (FSRCX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX) at 0.52%. This indicates that FSRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRCXVSGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.52%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

1.71%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

2.12%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

2.70%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

2.17%

+2.24%

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VSGBX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRCX vs. VSGBX - Dividend Comparison

FSRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than VSGBX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRCX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class C
3.09%3.32%2.59%3.03%2.08%3.36%3.59%3.33%2.50%3.20%2.69%2.46%
VSGBX
Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares
3.53%3.69%3.47%3.32%1.67%1.37%1.68%2.32%1.92%1.35%1.33%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRCX and VSGBX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRCX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to VSGBX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRCX dropped -18.16% vs VSGBX's -7.42%.

VSGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRCX and VSGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer