PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRBX vs. NOIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than NOIEX's 12.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has underperformed NOIEX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while NOIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.


FSRBX

1D
1.94%
1M
0.70%
YTD
4.61%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
10.83%

NOIEX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.04%
YTD
12.80%
6M
13.13%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
4.61%11.11%30.13%8.48%-12.61%38.21%-11.73%35.60%-19.04%12.72%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
12.80%18.81%24.28%19.56%-13.34%27.96%11.03%27.04%-6.62%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and NOIEX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 1994

0.67

The correlation between FSRBX and NOIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRBX vs. NOIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRBX
FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NOIEX
NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRBXNOIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.51

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.85

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

17.52

-13.99

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the NOIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRBX and NOIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRBXNOIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.74

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.88

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.78

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.69

-0.26

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, which is greater than NOIEX's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and NOIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRBXNOIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.89%

-45.66%

-31.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.60%

-8.39%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-18.06%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.95%

-21.89%

-20.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.23%

-35.31%

-15.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.86%

0.00%

-5.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-4.99%

-8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

1.82%

+4.09%

Volatility

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) at 2.73%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRBXNOIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

2.73%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

8.71%

+8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.65%

11.78%

+10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.87%

16.36%

+10.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.51%

17.96%

+11.55%

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than NOIEX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRBX vs. NOIEX - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than NOIEX's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRBX
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio
2.28%1.47%4.49%5.35%6.12%3.36%8.63%5.90%32.02%2.57%0.76%5.64%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
7.15%7.92%6.11%7.03%5.44%14.26%7.67%8.58%15.73%7.56%3.02%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRBX and NOIEX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRBX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to NOIEX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRBX dropped -76.89% vs NOIEX's -45.66%.

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRBX and NOIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer