FSRBX vs. FRBAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSRBX (Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio) and FRBAX (John Hancock Regional Bank Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX returned 12.46%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for FRBAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSRBX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for FRBAX.

Performance

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRBX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than FRBAX's 12.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has outperformed FRBAX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while FRBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.

FSRBX

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 6.37%
• YTD: 10.54%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: 28.50%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: 12.46%

FRBAX

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 12.63%
• 6M: 9.88%
• 1Y: 28.70%
• 3Y*: 26.25%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	10.54%	11.11%	30.13%	8.48%	-12.61%	38.21%	-11.73%	35.60%	-19.04%	12.72%
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	12.63%	11.07%	22.54%	-1.93%	-12.25%	40.51%	-10.11%	27.60%	-17.61%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRBX and FRBAX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1992	0.96

The correlation between FSRBX and FRBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSRBX vs. FRBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRBX

FSRBX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FSRBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FSRBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FSRBX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FSRBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FSRBX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FRBAX

FRBAX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FRBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FRBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FRBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FRBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FRBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRBX	FRBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.49	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	2.11	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	2.25	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.44	5.97	-1.52

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the FRBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRBX and FRBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, which is greater than FRBAX's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and FRBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRBX	FRBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.89%	-67.55%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.60%	-14.22%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.05%	-25.26%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.95%	-46.15%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.23%	-52.24%	+1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-1.21%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-12.27%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.94%	5.35%	+0.59%

Volatility

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) have volatilities of 5.92% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRBX	FRBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	5.89%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.33%	14.83%	+2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.82%	21.51%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.79%	26.45%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.52%	29.33%	+0.19%

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FRBAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRBX vs. FRBAX - Dividend Comparison

FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FRBAX's 7.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	7.41%	8.82%	9.72%	2.65%	5.83%	5.26%	2.43%	1.75%	1.92%	1.76%	2.94%	4.42%
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio	2.16%	1.47%	4.49%	5.35%	6.12%	3.36%	8.63%	5.90%	32.02%	2.57%	0.76%	5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRBX and FRBAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FSRBX and FRBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSRBX or FRBAX?

FSRBX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to FRBAX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRBX dropped -76.89% vs FRBAX's -67.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.