FSOL vs. ZCSH
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FSOL is actively managed, while ZCSH is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 41.32% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | -23.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and ZCSH is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
ZCSH
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.10 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -93.73% | +43.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -15.71% | -34.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -74.41% | +45.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.49% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 94.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 166.02% | -94.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 136.87% | -65.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 136.87% | -65.22% |
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 2.50% for ZCSH.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer