FSOL vs. PIPE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while PIPE is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PIPE.

Performance

FSOL vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -39.83% return, which is significantly lower than PIPE's 29.62% return.

FSOL

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -9.35%
• 6M: -36.29%
• YTD: -39.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PIPE

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.42%
• 6M: 20.35%
• YTD: 29.62%
• 1Y: 32.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	$1.71M	$1.70M	$2.78M
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	$120.83K	$81.36K	$87.35K

FSOL vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	-39.83%	-10.66%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	29.62%	2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOL and PIPE is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

FSOL vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 86
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSOL vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSOL	PIPE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.31	—

Drawdowns

FSOL vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than PIPE's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and PIPE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSOL	PIPE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.33%	-15.69%	-40.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.55%	-2.64%	-46.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-3.94%	-29.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSOL	PIPE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.56%	14.91%	+55.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.56%	18.62%	+51.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.56%	18.62%	+51.94%

FSOL vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PIPE's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSOL vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison

FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than PIPE's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	1.99%	0.00%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.71%	3.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSOL and PIPE in my portfolio?

FSOL and PIPE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FSOL or PIPE?

On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSOL or PIPE?

FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSOL or PIPE?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.99% for FSOL.

What is the main difference between FSOL and PIPE?

FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PIPE is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.75% for PIPE.