FSOL vs. FTEC
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. FSOL is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
FSOL vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -43.66% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -18.63%
- YTD
- -43.66%
- 6M
- -43.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.28%
FSOL vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -43.66% | -10.66% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 23.56% | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and FTEC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTEC
FSOL vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSOL | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.33% | -34.95% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -7.72% | -45.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.07% | -5.57% | -25.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.28% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.21% | 22.79% | +50.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 25.60% | +47.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.21% | 24.86% | +48.35% |
FSOL vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSOL vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and FTEC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FSOL.
FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.08% for FTEC.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer