FSOL vs. EZPZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ).

FSOL and EZPZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FSOL is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025. EZPZ is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. It was launched on Feb 20, 2025.

Performance

FSOL vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSOL vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	-32.70%	-11.84%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-23.94%	-7.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -32.70% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -23.94% return.

FSOL

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: -32.70%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZPZ

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 3.63%
• YTD: -23.94%
• 6M: -43.46%
• 1Y: -16.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOL vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FSOL

Fidelity Solana Fund

EZPZ

Franklin Crypto Index ETF

Return for Risk

FSOL vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 7
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOL vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSOL	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.95	-0.59	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between FSOL and EZPZ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSOL vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	0.66%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%

Drawdowns

FSOL vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -47.76%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSOL	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.76%	-52.38%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.57%	-48.71%	+5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.21%	-18.25%	-4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	24.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSOL	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	39.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.99%	48.54%	+32.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.99%	49.47%	+31.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.99%	49.47%	+31.52%