FSOL vs. EZPZ
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FSOL is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and EZPZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
EZPZ
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.61 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -52.38% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -51.59% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -21.72% | -7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 46.83% | +24.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 47.65% | +24.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 47.65% | +24.00% |
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSOL vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FSOL and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FSOL.
FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer