FSOL vs. BTRN
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FSOL is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
FSOL vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.29% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | -0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and BTRN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
BTRN
FSOL vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.00 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -36.97% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -25.29% | -25.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -14.41% | -14.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.68% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 19.91% | +51.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 30.96% | +40.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 30.96% | +40.69% |
FSOL vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than BTRN's 30.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and BTRN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.60%, compared with 2.03% for FSOL.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.95% for BTRN.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer