FSML vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FSML (Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FSML is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). FSML is actively managed, while TNA is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSML charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

FSML vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSML achieves a 23.14% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 61.11% return.

FSML

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 23.14%
• 6M: 20.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TNA

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 61.11%
• 6M: 51.22%
• 1Y: 120.41%
• 3Y*: 31.33%
• 5Y*: -5.46%
• 10Y*: 10.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSML vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF	23.14%	-3.75%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	61.11%	-9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FSML and TNA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

FSML vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSML

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 69
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSML vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSML	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.22	—

Drawdowns

FSML vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSML drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSML and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSML	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.83%	-88.09%	+77.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-32.53%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-65.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-31.86%	+31.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-33.92%	+31.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSML	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	42.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.63%	58.52%	-37.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	67.53%	-46.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.63%	68.40%	-47.77%

FSML vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSML has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSML vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

FSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than TNA's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF	0.15%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.29%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSML and TNA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FSML and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FSML or TNA?

On fees, FSML is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSML or TNA?

FSML is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSML or TNA?

TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.15% for FSML.

What is the main difference between FSML and TNA?

FSML is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSML and 1.05% for TNA.