FSML vs. SPSM
FSML (Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF) and SPSM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FSML is actively managed, while SPSM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSML charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPSM.
Performance
FSML vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSML having a 14.90% return and SPSM slightly lower at 14.72%.
FSML
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 14.90%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSM
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 31.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
FSML vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 14.90% | -3.75% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 14.72% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSML and SPSM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSML vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank
FSML
SPSM
FSML vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSML | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.45 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
FSML vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSML drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSML and SPSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSML | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -42.89% | +32.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -1.78% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -7.92% | +5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility
FSML vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSML | SPSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 17.54% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 21.44% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 22.99% | -2.28% |
FSML vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSML has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSML vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison
FSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SPSM's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 0.16% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPSM SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.85% | 1.61% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FSML and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPSM is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSML.
SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.16% for FSML.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSML and 0.05% for SPSM.
Find the right allocation for FSML and SPSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer