PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMDX vs. RSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSMDX having a 14.62% return and RSINX slightly lower at 14.37%. Over the past 10 years, FSMDX has outperformed RSINX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while RSINX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.


FSMDX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.55%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
20.38%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
11.54%
ALL TIME*
12.62%

RSINX

1D
2.11%
1M
4.78%
6M
10.55%
YTD
14.37%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.62%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
14.37%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%28.02%-9.55%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMDX and RSINX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.87

The correlation between FSMDX and RSINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMDX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDXRSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.42

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

8.76

+0.18

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMDX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and RSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDXRSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-66.11%

+25.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.64%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-20.23%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-23.08%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.35%

-40.86%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-10.49%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.39%

-0.29%

Volatility

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) is 2.43%, while Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FSMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDXRSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.43%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

8.15%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

12.03%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.99%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

19.06%

+0.21%

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMDX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than RSINX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
3.90%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMDX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSINX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FSMDX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMDX and RSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer