PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMD vs. SPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMD vs. SPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly lower than SPSM's 21.15% return.


FSMD

1D
-1.18%
1M
-1.05%
6M
12.13%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*

SPSM

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.19%
6M
15.20%
YTD
21.15%
1Y
30.30%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. SPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
16.35%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
21.15%6.11%8.55%16.11%-16.12%26.67%11.69%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and SPSM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FSMD and SPSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSMD vs. SPSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSMD
SPSM

Technology

20.5%
15.5%

Industrials

20.1%
15.4%

Financial Services

14.8%
17.7%

Healthcare

11.7%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
12.8%

Real Estate

6.2%
7.3%

Energy

4.1%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.2%

Utilities

2.1%
1.7%

Technology

FSMD
20.5%
SPSM
15.5%

Industrials

FSMD
20.1%
SPSM
15.4%

Financial Services

FSMD
14.8%
SPSM
17.7%

Healthcare

FSMD
11.7%
SPSM
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FSMD
10.6%
SPSM
12.8%

Real Estate

FSMD
6.2%
SPSM
7.3%

Energy

FSMD
4.1%
SPSM
5.9%

Basic Materials

FSMD
4.0%
SPSM
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

FSMD
3.1%
SPSM
3.9%

Communication Services

FSMD
2.9%
SPSM
3.2%

Utilities

FSMD
2.1%
SPSM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMD vs. SPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPSM
SPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. SPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDSPSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.49

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

11.75

-2.07

FSMD vs. SPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the SPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and SPSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. SPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum SPSM drawdown of -42.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and SPSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDSPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.67%

-42.89%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-8.72%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-27.94%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.16%

-27.94%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-2.25%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-7.87%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.59%

-0.21%

Volatility

FSMD vs. SPSM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF (SPSM) at 4.57%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDSPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

4.57%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

12.00%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

17.51%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

21.37%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

22.94%

-1.56%

FSMD vs. SPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPSM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMD vs. SPSM - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than SPSM's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.25%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPSM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF
1.39%1.62%1.85%1.61%1.38%1.40%1.34%1.58%1.82%1.51%1.49%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSMD and SPSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMD has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to SPSM (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs SPSM's -42.89%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.44% vs 7.68% for SPSM. On fees, SPSM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.44% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPSM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FSMD.

SPSM has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.25% for FSMD.

FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while SPSM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FSMD and 0.03% for SPSM.

SPSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMD and SPSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer