FSMD vs. AFMC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) and AFMC (First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while AFMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. FSMD is passively managed, while AFMC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 10.30%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for AFMC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSMD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AFMC.

Performance

FSMD vs. AFMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSMD having a 17.21% return and AFMC slightly lower at 16.92%.

FSMD

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 17.21%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: 10.30%
• 10Y*: —

AFMC

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMD vs. AFMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	17.21%	8.70%	15.18%	17.37%	-11.15%	26.40%	8.94%	2.85%
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	16.92%	10.23%	19.06%	21.46%	-15.55%	25.75%	5.87%	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMD and AFMC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.94

The correlation between FSMD and AFMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSMD vs. AFMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSMD	AFMC
Technology	20.5%	20.9%
Industrials	20.1%	20.7%
Financial Services	14.8%	12.8%
Healthcare	11.7%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	13.4%
Real Estate	6.2%	6.7%
Energy	4.1%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.0%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	2.8%
Communication Services	2.9%	1.6%
Utilities	2.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

FSMD vs. AFMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMD

FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 58
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 66

AFMC

AFMC Risk / Return Rank: 64
AFMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AFMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AFMC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AFMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AFMC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMD vs. AFMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSMD	AFMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.85	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.67	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	3.42	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.62	12.33	-0.71

FSMD vs. AFMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the AFMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMD and AFMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSMD vs. AFMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, roughly equal to the maximum AFMC drawdown of -42.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and AFMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSMD	AFMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.67%	-42.14%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-8.20%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.16%	-21.99%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.16%	-25.40%	+3.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-1.20%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-7.56%	+1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.27%	+0.07%

Volatility

FSMD vs. AFMC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) at 4.69%. This indicates that FSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSMD	AFMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	4.69%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.00%	11.34%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	15.23%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.54%	18.96%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.41%	22.89%	-1.48%

FSMD vs. AFMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AFMC's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSMD vs. AFMC - Dividend Comparison

FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than AFMC's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	0.77%	0.96%	0.64%	0.87%	1.42%	0.84%	1.05%	0.29%
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF	1.24%	1.33%	1.29%	1.37%	1.54%	1.18%	1.32%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSMD and AFMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FSMD and AFMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSMD or AFMC?

FSMD has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to AFMC (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs AFMC's -42.14%.

Which ETF is better, FSMD or AFMC?

On 5-year performance, AFMC leads with 10.79% vs 10.30% for FSMD. On fees, FSMD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, AFMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSMD or AFMC?

Over the 5-year period, AFMC has performed better with a 10.79% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSMD or AFMC?

FSMD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSMD or AFMC?

FSMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.77% for AFMC.

What is the main difference between FSMD and AFMC?

FSMD is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AFMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FSMD and 0.65% for AFMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.