FSLCX vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FSLCX (Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FSLCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCPGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX returned 10.30%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for FCPGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSLCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FCPGX.

Performance

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 24.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 10.30%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.

FSLCX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 13.03%
• YTD: 19.89%
• 1Y: 29.55%
• 3Y*: 18.47%
• 5Y*: 7.54%
• 10Y*: 10.30%

FCPGX

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 3.16%
• 6M: 17.09%
• YTD: 24.06%
• 1Y: 38.49%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: 14.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund	19.89%	14.95%	9.27%	19.70%	-22.71%	20.26%	13.80%	29.46%	-11.70%	13.78%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	24.06%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and FCPGX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004	0.93

The correlation between FSLCX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSLCX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLCX

FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSLCX	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.65	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.28	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.28	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.81	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.89	11.11	-3.23

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLCX	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.22%	-59.11%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.51%	-13.12%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.01%	-28.69%	+6.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.04%	-39.04%	+9.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.42%	-39.04%	-6.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.72%	-2.80%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-10.65%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.31%	+0.29%

Volatility

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 6.89%. This indicates that FSLCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLCX	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	6.89%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	17.42%	-1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.56%	22.33%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	23.71%	-2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	22.88%	-1.63%

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.43%, more than FCPGX's 5.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.15%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund	13.43%	14.91%	1.86%	0.02%	7.91%	22.97%	0.00%	0.31%	26.25%	8.92%	3.85%	10.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLCX and FCPGX in my portfolio?

FSLCX and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLCX or FCPGX?

FSLCX has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FCPGX (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.