PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLCX vs. FCPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 20.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.39% annualized return.


FSLCX

1D
2.82%
1M
-2.30%
6M
13.10%
YTD
17.46%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
10.06%
ALL TIME*
9.06%

FCPGX

1D
2.52%
1M
-3.07%
6M
16.38%
YTD
20.94%
1Y
36.65%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*
14.39%
ALL TIME*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
17.46%14.95%9.27%19.70%-22.71%20.26%13.80%29.46%-11.70%13.78%
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
20.94%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%36.31%-4.57%28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLCX and FCPGX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004

0.93

The correlation between FSLCX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLCX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSLCX
FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSLCXFCPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.50

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.14

9.38

-2.24

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLCX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and FCPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLCXFCPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.22%

-59.11%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-13.12%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.01%

-28.69%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-39.04%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.42%

-39.04%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-5.24%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-10.64%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

3.51%

+0.26%

Volatility

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) have volatilities of 6.00% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLCXFCPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

6.00%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

17.96%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

22.70%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

23.72%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

22.94%

-1.65%

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FCPGX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLCX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%, more than FCPGX's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.28%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
13.71%14.91%1.86%0.02%7.91%22.97%0.00%0.31%26.25%8.92%3.85%10.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLCX and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPGX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FSLCX (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLCX dropped -61.22% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLCX and FCPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer