PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLBX vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLBX vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLBX achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 13.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX has outperformed VXF with an annualized return of 13.95%, while VXF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.


FSLBX

1D
-1.65%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-13.00%
6M
-12.12%
1Y
-7.78%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
13.95%

VXF

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.75%
YTD
13.78%
6M
12.61%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLBX vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLBX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio
-13.00%5.78%35.74%27.77%-17.54%40.61%22.66%31.60%-15.37%27.74%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
13.78%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLBX and VXF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2002

0.84

The correlation between FSLBX and VXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLBX vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLBX
FSLBX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FSLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLBX vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLBXVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.29

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

2.84

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

10.07

-10.72

FSLBX vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLBX and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLBXVXFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

1.69

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.29

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.54

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.46

-0.01

Drawdowns

FSLBX vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLBX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, which is greater than VXF's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLBX and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLBXVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.20%

-58.03%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.67%

-10.21%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.06%

-26.92%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.87%

-36.39%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-41.72%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.80%

-1.02%

-17.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-9.55%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.60%

2.87%

+8.73%

Volatility

FSLBX vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) is 4.11%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that FSLBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLBXVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.87%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

12.44%

+4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

17.22%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.91%

22.33%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

22.29%

+1.35%

FSLBX vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLBX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLBX vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

FSLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than VXF's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLBX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio
2.25%0.67%0.69%1.22%2.09%1.39%3.08%4.25%8.94%5.46%1.25%6.37%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.02%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLBX and VXF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXF has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FSLBX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLBX dropped -68.20% vs VXF's -58.03%.

VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLBX and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer