FSLBX vs. FSRBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX).
FSLBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985. FSRBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | -18.16% | 5.78% | 35.74% | 27.77% | -17.54% | 40.61% | 22.66% | 31.60% | -15.37% | 27.74% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | -4.77% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLBX achieves a -18.16% return, which is significantly lower than FSRBX's -4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX has outperformed FSRBX with an annualized return of 13.24%, while FSRBX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.57% annualized return.
FSLBX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -20.14%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
FSRBX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLBX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRBX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSLBX vs. FSRBX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLBX
FSRBX
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLBX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 0.45 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | 0.74 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.11 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.56 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.46 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLBX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.45 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.27 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.36 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLBX and FSRBX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Dividend Comparison
FSLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FSRBX's 1.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.69% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 1.39% | 3.08% | 4.25% | 8.94% | 5.46% | 1.25% | 6.37% |
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 1.55% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
Drawdowns
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLBX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, smaller than the maximum FSRBX drawdown of -76.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLBX and FSRBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLBX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.20% | -76.89% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.67% | -15.60% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.87% | -41.95% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -51.23% | +10.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.61% | -14.30% | -9.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.86% | -13.30% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 6.00% | +3.25% |
Volatility
FSLBX vs. FSRBX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) at 4.78%. This indicates that FSLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSLBX | FSRBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 4.78% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.15% | 18.15% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.03% | 27.49% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.76% | 26.90% | -4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 29.52% | -5.85% |