PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLAX vs. GQSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLAX achieves a 20.21% return, which is significantly lower than GQSCX's 24.71% return.


FSLAX

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.28%
6M
14.21%
YTD
20.21%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

GQSCX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.02%
6M
19.44%
YTD
24.71%
1Y
43.61%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLAX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A
20.21%11.61%11.03%18.03%-20.87%31.07%16.96%32.10%-17.11%1.45%
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
24.71%12.22%11.49%18.94%-8.48%31.77%7.60%22.17%-11.32%1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLAX and GQSCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FSLAX and GQSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLAX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLAX
FSLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FSLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GQSCX
GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSLAXGQSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

5.10

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

18.57

-6.63

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLAX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLAX drawdown since its inception was -39.85%, smaller than the maximum GQSCX drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLAX and GQSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLAXGQSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.85%

-46.87%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.74%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.37%

-28.83%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.48%

-28.83%

-3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-0.16%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-8.08%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.47%

+0.06%

Volatility

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A (FSLAX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) at 3.97%. This indicates that FSLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLAXGQSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.97%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.98%

12.82%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

18.32%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

21.82%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

24.72%

-2.63%

Dividends

FSLAX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

FSLAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLAX
Fidelity Advisor 529 Small Cap Portfolio Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GQSCX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio
2.65%3.01%10.53%0.70%9.45%10.41%0.51%0.59%0.77%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLAX and GQSCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLAX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to GQSCX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLAX dropped -39.85% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLAX and GQSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer