PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSKGX vs. FMDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
-7.04%7.82%20.04%21.58%-26.20%21.62%29.50%6.25%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
-9.61%8.60%22.03%25.79%-26.67%12.67%34.84%4.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's -9.61% return.


FSKGX

1D
-1.97%
1M
-11.40%
YTD
-7.04%
6M
-14.07%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*

FMDGX

1D
-1.09%
1M
-9.53%
YTD
-9.61%
6M
-12.95%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSKGX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKGX
FSKGX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FSKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDGX
FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSKGXFMDGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

0.24

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

0.51

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

0.22

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.81

0.69

+0.12

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSKGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKGX and FMDGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSKGXFMDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.24

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.21

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.36

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between FSKGX and FMDGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

FSKGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.37%0.27%26.04%2.53%0.50%0.85%0.30%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
2.05%1.85%0.47%0.63%0.81%6.43%0.36%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, smaller than the maximum FMDGX drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and FMDGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSKGXFMDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.51%

-38.59%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.39%

-14.75%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-38.59%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.39%

-14.75%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-11.34%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

4.65%

+0.63%

Volatility

FSKGX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) at 5.67%. This indicates that FSKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSKGXFMDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.67%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

12.66%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

22.94%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

22.37%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.78%

24.47%

-1.69%