PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSKGX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSKGX and FBGRX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FSKGX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
18.18%
9.08%
FSKGX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSKGX:

1.47

FBGRX:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

FSKGX:

1.95

FBGRX:

1.76

Omega Ratio

FSKGX:

1.27

FBGRX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

FSKGX:

0.93

FBGRX:

1.78

Martin Ratio

FSKGX:

5.93

FBGRX:

5.38

Ulcer Index

FSKGX:

4.71%

FBGRX:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

FSKGX:

18.95%

FBGRX:

20.85%

Max Drawdown

FSKGX:

-49.53%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

FSKGX:

-10.21%

FBGRX:

-0.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 4.25% return.


FSKGX

YTD

10.44%

1M

4.27%

6M

17.28%

1Y

25.61%

5Y*

5.97%

10Y*

N/A

FBGRX

YTD

4.25%

1M

2.26%

6M

8.61%

1Y

25.31%

5Y*

14.56%

10Y*

13.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSKGX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FSKGX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSKGX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSKGX is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSKGX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.471.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.951.76
The chart of Omega ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.271.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.931.78
The chart of Martin ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 5.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.005.935.38
FSKGX
FBGRX

The current FSKGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKGX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.47
1.29
FSKGX
FBGRX

Dividends

FSKGX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FBGRX's 0.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
0.14%0.16%0.32%0.27%0.00%0.11%0.50%0.85%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.22%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

FSKGX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.21%
-0.64%
FSKGX
FBGRX

Volatility

FSKGX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) is 5.89%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that FSKGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.89%
6.43%
FSKGX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab