PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSKGX vs. FCNKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly lower than FCNKX's 5.63% return.


FSKGX

1D
3.40%
1M
-6.61%
6M
3.78%
YTD
3.88%
1Y
-0.69%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.31%

FCNKX

1D
0.94%
1M
-3.81%
6M
3.68%
YTD
5.63%
1Y
13.83%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
17.30%
ALL TIME*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
3.88%7.82%20.04%21.58%-26.20%21.62%29.50%36.90%-6.89%10.43%
FCNKX
Fidelity Contrafund
5.63%21.88%36.08%39.50%-27.44%24.66%32.50%30.18%-2.27%13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FSKGX and FCNKX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.86

The correlation between FSKGX and FCNKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSKGX vs. FCNKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSKGX
FSKGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FSKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNKX
FCNKX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FCNKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSKGXFCNKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.16

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

1.21

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

4.68

-5.15

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSKGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the FCNKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKGX and FCNKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, smaller than the maximum FCNKX drawdown of -46.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and FCNKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSKGXFCNKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.51%

-46.44%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.39%

-11.29%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.47%

-19.73%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-31.77%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.53%

-5.30%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-7.26%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

2.90%

+3.05%

Volatility

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNKX) at 3.82%. This indicates that FSKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSKGXFCNKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

3.82%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.41%

12.24%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.67%

15.49%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.45%

19.34%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

19.71%

+3.19%

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNKX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSKGX vs. FCNKX - Dividend Comparison

FSKGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNKX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.40%5.18%4.28%4.31%13.69%10.77%8.00%4.15%9.14%6.09%3.92%4.47%
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.37%0.27%26.04%2.53%0.50%0.85%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSKGX and FCNKX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSKGX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to FCNKX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSKGX dropped -36.51% vs FCNKX's -46.44%.

FCNKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSKGX and FCNKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer