PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSKGX vs. FNSBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSKGX and FNSBX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

FSKGX vs. FNSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund Class K (FNSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
62.39%
83.67%
FSKGX
FNSBX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSKGX:

0.02

FNSBX:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

FSKGX:

0.21

FNSBX:

0.58

Omega Ratio

FSKGX:

1.03

FNSBX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

FSKGX:

0.02

FNSBX:

0.36

Martin Ratio

FSKGX:

0.06

FNSBX:

1.65

Ulcer Index

FSKGX:

9.38%

FNSBX:

3.32%

Daily Std Dev

FSKGX:

26.61%

FNSBX:

16.32%

Max Drawdown

FSKGX:

-49.53%

FNSBX:

-30.88%

Current Drawdown

FSKGX:

-26.69%

FNSBX:

-9.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSKGX achieves a -9.83% return, which is significantly lower than FNSBX's -3.88% return.


FSKGX

YTD

-9.83%

1M

-2.00%

6M

-12.34%

1Y

1.46%

5Y*

4.83%

10Y*

N/A

FNSBX

YTD

-3.88%

1M

-6.29%

6M

-6.84%

1Y

5.92%

5Y*

11.96%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSKGX vs. FNSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSKGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSBX's 0.65% expense ratio.


FNSBX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund Class K
Expense ratio chart for FNSBX: current value is 0.65%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FNSBX: 0.65%
Expense ratio chart for FSKGX: current value is 0.45%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FSKGX: 0.45%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSKGX vs. FNSBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSKGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSKGX is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSKGX is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNSBX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNSBX is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNSBX is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNSBX is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNSBX is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNSBX is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSKGX vs. FNSBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund Class K (FNSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FSKGX: 0.02
FNSBX: 0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FSKGX: 0.21
FNSBX: 0.58
The chart of Omega ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FSKGX: 1.03
FNSBX: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FSKGX: 0.02
FNSBX: 0.36
The chart of Martin ratio for FSKGX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FSKGX: 0.06
FNSBX: 1.65

The current FSKGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the FNSBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSKGX and FNSBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.02
0.34
FSKGX
FNSBX

Dividends

FSKGX vs. FNSBX - Dividend Comparison

FSKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than FNSBX's 2.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FSKGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund
0.17%0.16%0.32%0.27%0.00%0.11%0.50%0.85%0.30%
FNSBX
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund Class K
2.22%2.13%1.92%11.92%11.83%4.99%6.57%7.80%2.86%

Drawdowns

FSKGX vs. FNSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSKGX drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than FNSBX's maximum drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSKGX and FNSBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-26.69%
-9.45%
FSKGX
FNSBX

Volatility

FSKGX vs. FNSBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 Fund (FSKGX) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund Class K (FNSBX) at 11.08%. This indicates that FSKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.27%
11.08%
FSKGX
FNSBX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab