FMDGX vs. VOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT).
FMDGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 11, 2019. VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006.
Performance
FMDGX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMDGX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | -6.36% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -6.47% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 4.73% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FMDGX having a -6.36% return and VOT slightly lower at -6.47%.
FMDGX
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- -6.36%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- 1Y
- 8.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
VOT
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -11.02%
- 1Y
- 6.52%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMDGX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FMDGX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
FMDGX
VOT
FMDGX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMDGX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.31 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 0.59 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.08 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.45 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 1.40 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMDGX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.31 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.20 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDGX and VOT is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMDGX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than VOT's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.98% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Drawdowns
FMDGX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDGX and VOT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDGX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.59% | -60.16% | +21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -15.96% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.59% | -37.19% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.68% | -12.28% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -10.01% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | 5.16% | -0.46% |
Volatility
FMDGX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 6.94% and 6.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMDGX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 6.63% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 12.39% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.17% | 21.04% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 21.33% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 20.92% | +3.58% |