FMDGX vs. VOT

In the year-to-date period, FMDGX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 1.16% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FMDGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FMDGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDGX and VOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VOT's 0.68% yield.

The maximum FMDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDGX and VOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 7.03%. This indicates that FMDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.