PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FSK vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FSK vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FSK (FS KKR Capital Corp.) is a stock, while IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, FSK returned 2.00%/yr vs 8.83%/yr for IGF. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FSK vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSK achieves a -26.00% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FSK has underperformed IGF with an annualized return of 2.00%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.

FSK

1D
-1.86%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
-26.00%
6M
-24.47%
1Y
-41.33%
3Y*
-4.73%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
2.00%

IGF

1D
0.36%
1M
0.20%
YTD
10.07%
6M
9.27%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
8.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSK vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSK
FS KKR Capital Corp.		-26.00%-20.38%25.71%33.04%-4.71%41.59%-10.27%33.89%-20.23%-21.23%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		10.07%21.31%14.81%6.14%-1.26%11.57%-6.50%25.82%-9.95%19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FSK and IGF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2014

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between FSK and IGF has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FS KKR Capital Corp.

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with FSK:
FSK vs. OBDCFSK vs. PSECFSK vs. MAINFSK vs. SCMFSK vs. SPYFSK vs. PRTFSK vs. JEPI
Often compared with IGF:
IGF vs. IFRAIGF vs. GIIIGF vs. NFRAIGF vs. SPYIGF vs. GLIFXIGF vs. VPUIGF vs. XLU

Return for Risk

FSK vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FSK
FSK Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSK Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSK vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FSKIGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.34
1.67

-3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.93
2.37

-4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.30

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

3.00

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

8.44

-9.66

FSK vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSK Sharpe Ratio is -1.34, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSK and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSK vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSK drawdown since its inception was -67.20%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSK and IGF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FSKIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.20%

-58.33%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.01%

-5.87%

-45.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.03%

-14.28%

-36.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.03%

-20.83%

-30.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.20%

-42.11%

-25.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.81%

-2.64%

-44.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.61%

-11.84%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.75%

2.08%

+31.67%

Volatility

FSK vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.37%. This indicates that FSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FSKIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

3.37%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.75%

8.73%

+18.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.91%

10.55%

+20.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

13.96%

+10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.96%

16.73%

+11.23%

Dividends

FSK vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

FSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.91%, more than IGF's 2.90% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSK
FS KKR Capital Corp.		22.91%18.91%13.35%14.77%15.20%11.80%15.46%12.40%16.41%11.68%8.65%9.91%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		2.90%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

FSK and IGF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSK has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to IGF (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSK dropped -67.20% vs IGF's -58.33%.

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSK and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer